Difference between revisions of "Talk:Argo Journal"

From Culture.si
m (Created page with 'dvojni oklepaji se pojavljajo v infoboxu pri linkih ~~~~ == pictures== *logo * naslovnica argota po moje je treba klicat urednike Tomaža Nabergoja ali pa damo za stike z javnos...')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
po moje je treba klicat urednike Tomaža Nabergoja ali pa damo za stike z javnostjo
 
po moje je treba klicat urednike Tomaža Nabergoja ali pa damo za stike z javnostjo
 
Tinko Selič
 
Tinko Selič
 +
 +
== Comments from Language Editor ==
 +
 +
Hi Jani,
 +
 +
I found this note about Argo at the SMD site, maybe this info is useful to a foreign audience, don't know. Perhaps it's too much detail. Anyway, I formulated something in English, a really rough translation and re-organisation of the text found [http://www.smd-drustvo.si/5_dejavnosti.htm#argo here].
 +
 +
Since 2006 the National Museum of Slovenia receives the funding for the publication of the journal from the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia directly and no longer relies upon the one-third contribution from its co-publishers. The co-publishers, however, are still involved and committed to overseeing the quality and standards of the journal.
 +
 +
Thoughts?
 +
[[User:Jwilcoxen|Jana Wilcoxen]] 14:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:37, 7 January 2010

dvojni oklepaji se pojavljajo v infoboxu pri linkih Ivan Pirnat 23:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

pictures

  • logo
  • naslovnica argota

po moje je treba klicat urednike Tomaža Nabergoja ali pa damo za stike z javnostjo Tinko Selič

Comments from Language Editor

Hi Jani,

I found this note about Argo at the SMD site, maybe this info is useful to a foreign audience, don't know. Perhaps it's too much detail. Anyway, I formulated something in English, a really rough translation and re-organisation of the text found here.

Since 2006 the National Museum of Slovenia receives the funding for the publication of the journal from the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia directly and no longer relies upon the one-third contribution from its co-publishers. The co-publishers, however, are still involved and committed to overseeing the quality and standards of the journal.

Thoughts? Jana Wilcoxen 14:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)