Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Media Art Timeline"
From Culture.si
(update Ljudmila info in timeline?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Mogoče bi veljalo omeniti, da je Ljudmila 2003 naredila oba slovenska projekta na Beneškem bienalu (peljhan in kariž) | * Mogoče bi veljalo omeniti, da je Ljudmila 2003 naredila oba slovenska projekta na Beneškem bienalu (peljhan in kariž) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==comments from language editor== | ||
| + | * Perhaps update this info about Ljudmila "It has remained an important structural support for many different new media projects up to this day." [[New_media_art_timeline#1995]] Perhaps something like: "It continues to provide important structural support for many different new media projects, today under the name [[Ljudmila Art and Science Laboratory]]." --[[User:Jwilcoxen|Jana Wilcoxen]] 11:26, 10 May 2011 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 10 May 2011
- za osvežitev oz. primerjavo gl. delovni blog projekta Arzenal Depo (Petja Grafenauer) --Admin 16:33, 8 May 2010 (CEST)
- 80-ta sem izpustila (oz. vključila v Introduction), preveč enostransko. --Admin 22:22, 19 May 2010 (CEST)
- Mogoče bi veljalo omeniti, da je Ljudmila 2003 naredila oba slovenska projekta na Beneškem bienalu (peljhan in kariž)
comments from language editor
- Perhaps update this info about Ljudmila "It has remained an important structural support for many different new media projects up to this day." New media art timeline Perhaps something like: "It continues to provide important structural support for many different new media projects, today under the name Ljudmila Art and Science Laboratory." --Jana Wilcoxen 11:26, 10 May 2011 (CEST)
