Difference between revisions of "Creative Europe in Slovenia"

From Culture.si
 
(114 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
{{#prop:set|nobalast|1}}
 
{{#prop:set|nobalast|1}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Creative Slovenia in 2017: a fascinating success!}}
+
{{FULLWIDTH}}
 +
<hr>
 +
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Creative Slovenia up to 2020: a fascinating feat}}
  
 
<div style="display:none">
 
<div style="display:none">
 +
 
{{Teaser|
 
{{Teaser|
 +
{{Image|Motovila Institute 2020 Results EU Coop Projects.png}}
  
{{image|Creative Europe Desk 2017 Ljubljana Puppet Theatre CE project.jpg}}
+
Slovene cultural producers have been consistently successful in the European Union's programmes for the cultural and creative sectors. Today, these programmes are united under the name Creative Europe.
 +
The national information office [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]] is led by the dedicated and trusted NGO [[Motovila Institute]].  
  
 +
Through an impressive performance of their application-genius, in 2020, 4 project leaders managed to claim no less than 1,4 million euros, while 14 Slovene producers are engaged as partners in the granted Cooperation Projects of the Culture subprogramme. The producers located in Ljubljana, Škofja Loka and Kranj have been collaborating with 94 partners from 24 countries, mostly the Netherlands (10), Italy (10), Spain (9), France (9), UK (6), and Greece (5). This time performing arts projects (music, theatre, dance) prevail (almost 50%), while the number of cultural heritage and visual arts projects is not scarce as well (circa 20% each).
 +
 +
Besides, the EACEA has selected 13 projects within the Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans scheme, and among them supported one project with Slovenian leader ([[Pazi!Park Association]]) while 7 Slovenian partner organisations are involved in further sucessful projects.
 +
 +
Successful EU projects/producers 2000&ndash;2020 are featured in the infographic.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Ever since the year 2000 hundreds of cultural organisations from across Europe get to be annually united in a very curios set of discursive and administrative protocols and rituals. After adding the final touches to their respective, often painstakingly compiled project propositions, they apply for funds from the European Union's cultural programme. As of 2014 this programme is known as ''Creative Europe'', covering the period of 2014&ndash;2020. It is a continuation of the relatively similar ''Culture 2007'' and ''Culture 2000''schemes, further preceded by some smaller programmes. All of them are based on the Treaty of Maastricht (1992), with which the EU was actually granted its (still somewhat limited) legitimacy to act in the cultural domain.
+
Since 1997, hundreds of cultural organisations from across Europe have joined in for a very special set of administrative and discursive protocols. New projects are painstakingly compiled and proposed each year as artists and producers aim for co-funding from one of the European Union's cultural programmes.  
 +
 
 +
Worth about a billion and a half euros and covering the period between 2014 and 2020, Creative Europe is an instrument to support the creation of a shared European cultural space and identity. It is divided into two subprogrammes: the film-focused MEDIA; and the more diverse Culture subprogramme, further partitioned into Literary Translations, European Platforms, European Networks and Cooperation Projects. Slovene cultural producers have been consistently excelling in the latter with considerable panache. In 2020, 18 Slovene organisations are either leaders or partners in 17 out of all 113 supported Cooperation Projects of the Culture subprogramme.  
 +
 
  
Worth about a billion and a half euros, Creative Europe is &ndash; in short &ndash; intended to support the creation of a shared European cultural space (and identity). It is divided into two parts &ndash; the film focused MEDIA part (up until 2014 a separate entity), and the more diverse CULTURE part. This one is further partitioned into ''Literary Translations'', ''European Platforms'', ''European Networks'' and ''Cooperation Projects'' sub-programmes. It is through this latter one that Slovene cultural producers have been recently managing to continuously excel with quite some ''panache''.
+
==EU funding illustrated==
  
In a stunning performance of their application-genius, Slovene cultural organisations managed to claim no less than 1,2 million of the roughly 35 million euros at stake for ''Cooperation Projects'' in 2017.  
+
The infographic (unfortunately data are not accessible any more) was based on an interoperability project carried out by [[Culture.si]] and [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia|CED Slovenia]] / [[Motovila Institute]]. It featured data that relates to EU funding for culture as a whole, encompassing the film and audiovisual media programmes (up until 2014 led under a separate entity known as MEDIA) as well as the two seven-year schemes under the Culture programme (these were preceded by some smaller sector-related programmes from the late 1990s, for which Slovenia was not eligible yet).
  
==The creative Slovenia==
+
Each square represents one participant organisation. Clicking on a square takes you to the more in-depth project descriptions. The infographic itself shows the distribution of projects by art field, by the organisation's role in the project and &ndash; interestingly &ndash; by the organisation's status as either a public or a private entity.
  
It must nevertheless be said that even such a performance was really only a minor surprise. Last year, when analysing the results between 2014 and 2016, Peter Inkei from the ''Budapest observatory'' already stated that »Slovenia is the incontestable east-central European champion in the Creative Europe programme«. He thus only reiterated himself when he recently (in May 2017) wrote that »the champion is again Slovenia with a 35% success rate«. 
+
==Natural-born cultural managers? ==
  
Sports metaphors aside, what he is referring to is that out of 20 projects with a Slovene 'leader' (the projects are always comprised of one leading organisation and several partner ones), 7 managed to be successful. Additionally, the other 74 endorsed projects (chosen out of the 548 sent in) further feature 10 more Slovene organisation as partners (which, between us, is often the preferable position in terms of the funds/responsibility trade-off). With all this in mind, Inkei rhetorically wonders if Slovenes are "born cultural managers".
+
When analysing the results of the previous years (2007&ndash;2011 and 2014&ndash;2015), Peter Inkei of the ''Budapest Observatory'' already stated in 2016 that "Slovenia is the incontestable east-central European champion in the Creative Europe programme". Thus his recent statement is merely a reiteration, as he wrote in May 2017, that "the champion is again Slovenia with a 35% success rate".
  
We'll obviously leave genetics to others, as we'll also do with the complex historic composition of the Slovene cultural NGO scene. However, there is one possibly quite crucial factor that seems to stand out &ndash; it is the [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]], a small NGO helping out the applicants with workshops, advice, networking, lectures and other matters of general support. Out of the many things they do is also a curious data mining and interoperability project, done together with our portal and resulting in the interactive infographic presented bellow.
+
He is referencing the phenomenal success rate shown in 2017: out of 20 projects with a Slovene "project leader" (the projects are comprised of one lead organisation and several partner ones), 7 managed to be successful in obtaining funds. The other 74 endorsed projects &ndash; chosen out of the 548 submitted applications &ndash; featured 10 Slovene organisation as partners (which can often be a preferable position in terms of the funding/responsibility trade-off). With all this in mind, Inkei rhetorically wonders if Slovenes are "born cultural managers". They might be, but more probably it is the complex historic composition of the Slovene cultural landscape (especially the NGO scene) that should [https://www.culture.si/en/EU_funding_for_culture_4_observations_from_Slovenia offer interesting clues] in this regard.  
  
{{MediaWiki:Infografics EUProjects}}
+
{{wide Image|Motovila Institute 2018 Uspesno Ustvarjalno Photo Katja Goljat.jpg}}
  
The visualisation above represents the data related to the EU funding for culture as a whole, also encompassing the filed of film and audiovisual media. You can see the distribution of projects by art field, by the organisation's role in the project (leader/partner) and &ndash; interestingly &ndash; by the organisation's status as either a public or a private entity. Each square represents one participant, linking to his profile on our portal (the profile itself includes a complete list of one's European projects).  
+
== Input of the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia (Motovila Institute) ==
 +
 +
There is, however, one factor that seems to stand out as rather important &ndash; the [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]]. This is the national information office for such matters, led by the small, but dedicated and trusted, NGO [[Motovila Institute]]. Recently, its crew, in a telling phrase that further elaborates Inkei's remark, has been labelled by one of the grant-winning producers as "our mothers".  
  
==List of ''Cooperation Projects'' recipients in 2017==
+
Be that as it may, helping out the applicants with advice, conducting informative workshops and carrying out other matters of general support, Motovila team sports a systematic approach towards producing a community-based pool of skills, tricks, contacts and the like.
  
At the moment only the results of the ''Cooperation Projects'' call are known for 2017. However, what is somewhat striking and can already be discerned is that public institutions have significantly boosted their Creative Europe profile, and have almost caught up with the previously much more industrious NGO sector. What are the reasons for this and if the still reigning policies of public austerity can be of any guide in this regard is a speculation better left to others.  
+
In any case, 2018, 2019 and 2020 brought excellent results again.
  
Here bellow is a list of the organisations that were successful in the Creative Europe Cooperation Projects call, as unveiled in May 2017.
+
==Recent Culture Cooperation Project recipients==
 +
 
 +
The chosen propositions from Slovenia are of course very diverse. One would be hard-pressed to find a common theme even as the wordings of project descriptions tend to be somewhat generic, their authors striving to align them with the supposed affinities of Brussels.
 +
 
 +
The composition of successful organisations is similarly miscellaneous, ranging from small organisations to big and venerated art producers. While 6 of the participating organisations haven't had any prior experience in EU's cultural programmes, 14 of them are veterans with at least one project under their belts. If, in 2017, the public institutions significantly boosted their Creative Europe profile, and almost caught up with the previously much more industrious NGO sector, also in 2018, out of 18 organisations there were 8 successful public institutions.
 +
 
 +
{{wide Image|EU funding infographic public-private status 2019.png}}
 +
 
 +
In 2019, the number of successful public institutions (13) was even a bit higher than the number of NGO organisations (12). The 3 producers that got the grant as lead organisations are involved as partners in another granted Cooperation Projects. The producers located in Ljubljana, Maribor, Nova Gorica, Novo mesto and Murska Sobota collaborate mostly with partners from Italy (15), Germany (12), Belgium (11), UK (11), and Poland (10).
 +
 
 +
In 2020, the number of successful NGO organisations (10) and public institutions (8) is almost equal, they have their seats in Ljubljana, Škofja Loka and Kranj. All partners cooperate with 94 organisations from 24 countries, mostly with the Dutch, Italian, Spanish, French, British and Greek partners.
 +
 
 +
{{wide Image|Motovila Institute 2020 Results EU Coop Projects.png}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans ===
 +
 
 +
The 2020 call strengthening cultural cooperation with and the competiveness of cultural and creative industries in the Western Balkans resulted in 320 project proposals. The EACEA selected 13 projects for support, among them one project with a Slovenian leader ([[Pazi!Park Association]]), while 7 Slovenian partner organisations are involved in another 6 successful projects. The Western Balkans call resulted in many new connections for Slovenian organisations with partners from Albania, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia. See the list of organisations below.
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
===2020 Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans recipients===
 +
 
 +
* [[Pazi!Park Association]] (lead)
 +
* [[Festival Ljubljana Public Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Nomad Dance Academy Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[Lokar Gallery]] (partner)
 +
* [[Asociacija, Association of Arts and Culture NGOs and Freelancers]] (partner)
 +
* [[Studio for Research into the Art of Acting]] (partner)
 +
* [[Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[Navipro]] (partner)
 +
 
 +
=== 2020 recipients ===
 +
 
 +
* [[Exodos Institute]] (lead)
 +
* [[Slovene Association of Historic Towns]] (lead)
 +
* [[Ljubljana Puppet Theatre]] (lead)
 +
* [[Radio-Television Slovenia (RTV Slovenia)]] (lead)
 +
* [[International Centre of Graphic Arts, Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[Ljudmila Art and Science Laboratory]] (partner)
 +
* [[Public Fund for Cultural Activities of the Republic of Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[Kersnikova Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Beletrina Publishing Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[National Museum of Contemporary History]] (partner)
 +
* [[ProstoRož]] (partner)
 +
* [[Kranj City Library]] partner)
 +
* [[Nomad Dance Academy Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[Bunker Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[City of Women Association for Promotion of Women in Culture]] (partner)
 +
* [[Druga godba Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[Jožef Stefan Institute]] (partner)
 +
 
 +
=== 2019 recipients ===
 +
* [[City of Women Association for Promotion of Women in Culture]] (lead and partner)
 +
* [[Pionirski dom Youth Culture Centre]] (lead and partner)
 +
* [[Radio Študent (RŠ)]] (lead)
 +
* [[Slovenian Theatre Institute]] (lead)
 +
* [[Goga Publishing House]] (lead and partner)
 +
* [[National Museum of Contemporary History]] (partner)
 +
* [[Ljubljana Puppet Theatre]] (partner in 2 projects)
 +
* [[Bunker Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[SIGIC, Slovene Music Information Centre]] (partner)
 +
* [[Slovene Ethnographic Museum]] (partner)
 +
* [[National and University Library]] (partner)
 +
* [[Rakičan Mansion Research and Education Centre]] (partner)
 +
* [[Public Fund for Cultural Activities of the Republic of Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[Slovenian Book Agency]] (partner)
 +
* [[Kersnikova Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Slovene Writers’ Association]] (partner)
 +
* [[Association for Contemporary Arts X-OP]] (partner)
 +
* [[SCCA-Ljubljana Centre for Contemporary Arts]] (partner)
 +
* [[Projekt Atol Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Maribor Art Gallery]] (partner)
 +
* [[University of Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[University of Nova Gorica]] (partner)
 +
* [[Young Dragons Public Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[TiPovej Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Cona Institute]] (partner)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== 2018 recipients ===
 +
 
 +
* [[Bunker Institute]] (lead and partner))
 +
* [[Imago Sloveniae]] (lead)
 +
* [[Projekt Atol Institute]] (lead)
 +
* [[Slovene Association of Historic Towns]] (lead)
 +
* [[Slovene Writers’ Association]] (lead and partner)
 +
* [[Dance Theatre Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[Glej Theatre]] (partner)
 +
* [[City of Women Association for Promotion of Women in Culture]] (partner)
 +
* [[Druga godba Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[International Centre of Graphic Arts, Ljubljana]] (partner)
 +
* [[Kersnikova Institute]] (partner)
 +
* [[Ljubljana Puppet Theatre]] (partner)
 +
* [[Moderna galerija / Museum of Modern Art, Ljubljana plus Museum of Contemporary Art Metelkova]] (partner)
 +
* [[Municipality of Piran-Pirano]] (partner)
 +
* [[Museum of Architecture and Design]] (partner)
 +
* [[Nomad Dance Academy Slovenia]] (partner)
 +
* [[Slovene National Theatre Maribor]] (partner)
 +
* [[Slovene National Theatre Nova Gorica]] (partner)
 +
* [[Scientific Research Centre (ZRC SAZU), Slovene Academy of Science and Arts]] (partner)
 +
* [[Walk of Peace in the Soča Region Foundation]] (partner)
 +
 
 +
{{Image|Slovene Association of Historic Towns (logo) Refresh project.jpg}}
 +
 
 +
The REFRESH cooperation project led by [[Slovene Association of Historic Towns]] got the Creative Europe support related to the [[European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== 2017 recipients ===
 +
 
 +
* [[Aksioma Institute]] (lead)
 +
* [[Goga Publishing House]] (lead)
 +
* [[House! Society for People and Spaces]] (lead)
 +
* [[Moderna galerija / Museum of Modern Art, Ljubljana plus Museum of Contemporary Art Metelkova]] (lead)
 +
* [[MoTA Museum of Transitory Art]] (lead)
 +
* [[Pionirski dom Youth Culture Centre]] (lead)
 +
* [[Sodobnost International Cultural Society]] (lead)
  
* [[Aksioma Institute]]
 
 
* [[City of Women Association for Promotion of Women in Culture]]  
 
* [[City of Women Association for Promotion of Women in Culture]]  
* [[Department of Art History, University of Ljubljana]]
 
 
* [[Federacija Institute]]
 
* [[Federacija Institute]]
 
* [[Gallus Foundation]]
 
* [[Gallus Foundation]]
* [[Goga Publishing House]]
+
* [[Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia]]
* [[House! Society for People and Spaces]]
+
* [[Department of Art History, University of Ljubljana]]
* [[Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, Maribor Regional Office]]
 
 
* [[Kino Šiška Centre for Urban Culture]]
 
* [[Kino Šiška Centre for Urban Culture]]
 
* [[Ljubljana Puppet Theatre]]
 
* [[Ljubljana Puppet Theatre]]
 
* [[Ljudmila Art and Science Laboratory]]
 
* [[Ljudmila Art and Science Laboratory]]
 
* [[Maribor Art Gallery]]
 
* [[Maribor Art Gallery]]
* [[Moderna galerija (MG)]]
+
* [[Technical Museum of Slovenia]]
* [[MoTA Museum of Transitory Art]]
+
 
* [[Pionirski dom Youth Culture Centre]]
+
===European platforms===
 +
* [[Museum of Architecture and Design]]
 +
* [[Beletrina Publishing Institute]]
 +
 
 +
===Literary translation scheme===
 
* [[Sodobnost International Cultural Society]]
 
* [[Sodobnost International Cultural Society]]
* [[Technical Museum of Slovenia]]
+
* [[Slovene Writers’ Association]]
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
 
* [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]]
 
* [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]]
* [[:Category:EU_funding_of_Slovene_organisations_(Culture_and_MEDIA_Programmes)|A list of ALL Slovene organisations ever funded by the Culture and MEDIA Programmes]]
+
* [[:Category:EU_funding_of_Slovene_organisations_(Culture_and_MEDIA_Programmes)|A list of ALL Slovene organisations funded by the Culture and MEDIA Programmes 2000-2020]]
* [[:Category: Culture.si infographics|Culture.si infographics]]
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
* [http://www.budobs.org/component/content/article/14-memo/462-memo-april-2017.html April 2017 news from the Budapest Observatory, commenting on the Creative Europe Collaboration Projects 2017 results]
* [http://www.budobs.org/component/content/article/14-memo/462-memo-april-2017.html April 2017 news from the Budapest Observatory, commenting on the CEP results]
+
* [http://www.budobs.org/narchive/14-memo/449-memo-may-2016.html#b%C3%ADcycles May 2016 news from the Budapest Observatory, also commenting on the Creative Europe Collaboration Projects 2016 results]
* [http://www.budobs.org/narchive/14-memo/449-memo-may-2016.html#b%C3%ADcycles May 2017 news from the Budapest Observatory, also commenting on the CEP results ]
+
* [http://www.budobs.org/files/creative_bicycles_15.pdf "The Story of 751 Bonds", a research paper on partnerships in EU-financed cultural projects, 2007-2011 and 2014-2015]
* [http://www.budobs.org/files/creative_bicycles_15.pdf Research paper by the Budapest Observatory]
+
* [http://www.culture.si/blog/2014/10/eu-funding-for-culture-4-observations-from-slovenia/ EU funding for culture? 4 observations from Slovenia], a blog post by Culture.si and [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]] in 2014
* [http://www.culture.si/blog/2014/10/eu-funding-for-culture-4-observations-from-slovenia/ EU funding for culture? 4 observations from Slovenia], a blog post by Culture.si and [[Creative Europe Desk Slovenia]]
 
  
  
[[Category:EU_Creative_Europe,_Culture_funding_recipient]]
 
 
[[Category:Culture.si infographics]]
 
[[Category:Culture.si infographics]]
 
[[Category:Editorial]]
 
[[Category:Editorial]]
 +
[[Category:Updated 2019]]

Latest revision as of 23:52, 5 November 2023





Motovila Institute 2020 Results EU Coop Projects.pngThe infographic featuring the international impact of 18 successful producers from Slovenia who have received the Creative Europe funds in 2020 for cooperation with 94 partners from 24 countries! Prepared by Motovila Institute that operates the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia.

Slovene cultural producers have been consistently successful in the European Union's programmes for the cultural and creative sectors. Today, these programmes are united under the name Creative Europe. The national information office Creative Europe Desk Slovenia is led by the dedicated and trusted NGO Motovila Institute.

Through an impressive performance of their application-genius, in 2020, 4 project leaders managed to claim no less than 1,4 million euros, while 14 Slovene producers are engaged as partners in the granted Cooperation Projects of the Culture subprogramme. The producers located in Ljubljana, Škofja Loka and Kranj have been collaborating with 94 partners from 24 countries, mostly the Netherlands (10), Italy (10), Spain (9), France (9), UK (6), and Greece (5). This time performing arts projects (music, theatre, dance) prevail (almost 50%), while the number of cultural heritage and visual arts projects is not scarce as well (circa 20% each).

Besides, the EACEA has selected 13 projects within the Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans scheme, and among them supported one project with Slovenian leader (Pazi!Park Association) while 7 Slovenian partner organisations are involved in further sucessful projects.

Successful EU projects/producers 2000–2020 are featured in the infographic.


Since 1997, hundreds of cultural organisations from across Europe have joined in for a very special set of administrative and discursive protocols. New projects are painstakingly compiled and proposed each year as artists and producers aim for co-funding from one of the European Union's cultural programmes.

Worth about a billion and a half euros and covering the period between 2014 and 2020, Creative Europe is an instrument to support the creation of a shared European cultural space and identity. It is divided into two subprogrammes: the film-focused MEDIA; and the more diverse Culture subprogramme, further partitioned into Literary Translations, European Platforms, European Networks and Cooperation Projects. Slovene cultural producers have been consistently excelling in the latter with considerable panache. In 2020, 18 Slovene organisations are either leaders or partners in 17 out of all 113 supported Cooperation Projects of the Culture subprogramme.


EU funding illustrated

The infographic (unfortunately data are not accessible any more) was based on an interoperability project carried out by Culture.si and CED Slovenia / Motovila Institute. It featured data that relates to EU funding for culture as a whole, encompassing the film and audiovisual media programmes (up until 2014 led under a separate entity known as MEDIA) as well as the two seven-year schemes under the Culture programme (these were preceded by some smaller sector-related programmes from the late 1990s, for which Slovenia was not eligible yet).

Each square represents one participant organisation. Clicking on a square takes you to the more in-depth project descriptions. The infographic itself shows the distribution of projects by art field, by the organisation's role in the project and – interestingly – by the organisation's status as either a public or a private entity.

Natural-born cultural managers?

When analysing the results of the previous years (2007–2011 and 2014–2015), Peter Inkei of the Budapest Observatory already stated in 2016 that "Slovenia is the incontestable east-central European champion in the Creative Europe programme". Thus his recent statement is merely a reiteration, as he wrote in May 2017, that "the champion is again Slovenia with a 35% success rate".

He is referencing the phenomenal success rate shown in 2017: out of 20 projects with a Slovene "project leader" (the projects are comprised of one lead organisation and several partner ones), 7 managed to be successful in obtaining funds. The other 74 endorsed projects – chosen out of the 548 submitted applications – featured 10 Slovene organisation as partners (which can often be a preferable position in terms of the funding/responsibility trade-off). With all this in mind, Inkei rhetorically wonders if Slovenes are "born cultural managers". They might be, but more probably it is the complex historic composition of the Slovene cultural landscape (especially the NGO scene) that should offer interesting clues in this regard.

Motovila Institute 2018 Uspesno Ustvarjalno Photo Katja Goljat.jpgMotovila Institute / Creative Europe Desk Slovenia event Uspešno ... Ustvarjalno (Successful ... Creative), hosting Slovenian producers involved in the Creative Europe funding scheme, 2018.

Input of the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia (Motovila Institute)

There is, however, one factor that seems to stand out as rather important – the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia. This is the national information office for such matters, led by the small, but dedicated and trusted, NGO Motovila Institute. Recently, its crew, in a telling phrase that further elaborates Inkei's remark, has been labelled by one of the grant-winning producers as "our mothers".

Be that as it may, helping out the applicants with advice, conducting informative workshops and carrying out other matters of general support, Motovila team sports a systematic approach towards producing a community-based pool of skills, tricks, contacts and the like.

In any case, 2018, 2019 and 2020 brought excellent results again.

Recent Culture Cooperation Project recipients

The chosen propositions from Slovenia are of course very diverse. One would be hard-pressed to find a common theme even as the wordings of project descriptions tend to be somewhat generic, their authors striving to align them with the supposed affinities of Brussels.

The composition of successful organisations is similarly miscellaneous, ranging from small organisations to big and venerated art producers. While 6 of the participating organisations haven't had any prior experience in EU's cultural programmes, 14 of them are veterans with at least one project under their belts. If, in 2017, the public institutions significantly boosted their Creative Europe profile, and almost caught up with the previously much more industrious NGO sector, also in 2018, out of 18 organisations there were 8 successful public institutions.

EU funding infographic public-private status 2019.pngOnline version (printscreen) of interactive EU funding infographic, featuring successful producers with public or private status, recipients of EU Funding 2000-2019 (Culture and Media). Data have been collected by Motovila Institute that operates the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia

In 2019, the number of successful public institutions (13) was even a bit higher than the number of NGO organisations (12). The 3 producers that got the grant as lead organisations are involved as partners in another granted Cooperation Projects. The producers located in Ljubljana, Maribor, Nova Gorica, Novo mesto and Murska Sobota collaborate mostly with partners from Italy (15), Germany (12), Belgium (11), UK (11), and Poland (10).

In 2020, the number of successful NGO organisations (10) and public institutions (8) is almost equal, they have their seats in Ljubljana, Škofja Loka and Kranj. All partners cooperate with 94 organisations from 24 countries, mostly with the Dutch, Italian, Spanish, French, British and Greek partners.

Motovila Institute 2020 Results EU Coop Projects.pngThe infographic featuring the international impact of 18 successful producers from Slovenia who have received the Creative Europe funds in 2020 for cooperation with 94 partners from 24 countries! Prepared by Motovila Institute that operates the Creative Europe Desk Slovenia.


Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans

The 2020 call strengthening cultural cooperation with and the competiveness of cultural and creative industries in the Western Balkans resulted in 320 project proposals. The EACEA selected 13 projects for support, among them one project with a Slovenian leader (Pazi!Park Association), while 7 Slovenian partner organisations are involved in another 6 successful projects. The Western Balkans call resulted in many new connections for Slovenian organisations with partners from Albania, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia. See the list of organisations below.



2020 Cultural Cooperation Projects in the Western Balkans recipients

2020 recipients

2019 recipients


2018 recipients

Slovene Association of Historic Towns (logo) Refresh project.jpgThe logotype of the REFRESH cooperation project related to the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018, led by Slovene Association of Historic Towns, supported by Creative Europe

The REFRESH cooperation project led by Slovene Association of Historic Towns got the Creative Europe support related to the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018.


2017 recipients

European platforms

Literary translation scheme

See also

External links

[[Image:Motovila Institute 2020 Results EUMotovila Institute 2020 Results EU Coop Projects.png<small class="imgdesc">The infographic featuring the international impact of 18 successful producers from Slovenia who have received the Creative Europe funds in 2020 for cooperation with 94 partners from 24 countries!ration with 94 partners from 24 countries! +
The infographic featuring the international impact of 18 successful producers from Slovenia who have received the Creative Europe funds in 2020 for cooperation with 94 partners from 24 countries! +